The Way to Securing the Success of the National Rreconciliation’s
Process
Hasan Moosa Shafaei
Once again our hopes are raised, shared by the general
public and others, whether countries, institutions or organisations
who are genuinely keen on Bahrain’s stability and development. The
feel good factor that a solution to the Bahraini crisis is within
reach has been triggered by Crown Prince Sheikh Salman Bin Hamad
Al Khalifa‘s latest serious engagement in the dialogue process,
and by some leaked reports quoting numerous sources suggesting that
a bargain for a solution is on the way.
|
Hasan Moosa Shafaei |
This time around we hope that our wishes and prayers would be
answered and that Bahrain would embark on a promising prospect of
reform, change and stability.
Bahrain needs to emerge from its political crisis, firstly by
ensuring the success of the national dialogue, and the establishment
of a political system where everyone works towards consolidating
democracy, and secondly, through reinvigorating the civil society
and embracing developments that would reaffirm the basic principles
of human rights and their actual respect on the ground.
While a dialogue is taking place between the different political
parties, the situation on the streets still remains tense. Violence
has not stopped but has in fact increased on the backdrop of news
that some diffusion regarding the situation is about to take place.
In order to secure a safe and stable future for Bahrain, we should
look for the following:
● A permanent solution to the political crisis. Transitional
solutions would bring nothing more than transitional stability.
The Bahraini people are tired of the continuous recurrence of the
crisis during the last decades. This repetition in itself indicates
that the problems themselves have not been radically resolved, perhaps
because radical solutions require radical changes in the political
structure. There are those around who fear such changes. This was
the reason why gradual changes where favoured although they tend
to lose momentum over time.
● A consensual sustainable solution. This means what would be
agreed upon today between all concerned forces should not be changed
tomorrow. It also means that this solution depends on the blessings
of the popular majority - otherwise any political agreements would
be fragile and short lived. This in turn necessitates that any settlements
should be based on justice and be well balanced in such a way that
would make them look convincing, easy to defend and more likely
to attract public satisfaction.
A Consensual solution as we have ascertained many times before
depends on the creation of a political system that depend on three
elements or basics:
- Monarchy: there is no way that a
political system could be changed through one political party, whether
by force or persuasion. The Monarchy is supposed to be the umbrella
for both components of the community, the arbitrator and the adjuster
of the political balance. This Monarchy could develop in the future
to become a constitutional one, in accordance with the Constitution
- Consensual: Where all components
of the community would agree on the scope of the changes and determine
the regimes policies and direction.
- Democratic: Which conforms with the
international human rights principles regarding justice, equality,
accountability as well as the respect for diversity, public’s opinion,
freedom of expression and choice and the civil and political rights.
● The consensus among the three parties, The Shias, Sunnis and
the Royal Family, is the basis for the solution. There is no one
party that can abolish the others politically. Bahrain had tried
that before, and some think that opportunities are still there to
make the current dialogue a success; because all parties have reached
the conclusion that neither the use of force, marginalisation, discrimination,
nor taking to the streets, violence, tribalism, inflaming sectarianism
is enough to tip the balance of power radically in favour of one
party at the expense of the other.
All that is not enough, what needs to be done to emerge from
the political crisis is:
1. Mutual concessions: although Bahrain
has not been stable for the past three years, it has for two years
at least been frozen in some sort of a political stalemate. In spite
of the presentation of some political schemes, the emergence of
many calls for dialogue, and even the actual convening of some dialogue
sessions, the eventual outcome had always been failure, and that
was due to the fact that none of the parties concerned were prepared
to give the necessary concessions that could secure success. Each
party was waiting for the other to offer concessions so it could
eventually get the Lion’s share of the bargain. Unfortunately things
do not work that way in politics. As long as the balance of power
is maintained, there is no solution but the political one, which
could only be reached via mutual concessions no matter how painful
they might be. Indeed, each party can raise the ceiling of its demands
as that is one of the negotiating tools. However, when dialogue
begins, each party should know exactly what concessions to offer
in order to allow the negotiators to reach consensual and agreed
upon solutions.
Whoever insists on intransigence and refusal to compromise will
bear the full responsibility of allowing the crisis to drag on.
We do not believe that either Bahrain or the Bahraini society would
want to continue living in such a state of stalemate that allows
the energy and resources of both the country and the community to
be drained by an acute political strife that would affect all aspects
of life, deepen the cracks within society, weaken the status of
the state, tarnish its reputation and make it, more than any time
before, susceptible to foreign interferences, if not intervention.
Who in their right mind would want this to go on?
2. Confidence building: this could
only happen when the authority of decision-making is withdrawn from
the streets, and handed back to the political elites. In fact the
public element has been imposed on the political strife for a long
time as a tool to force radical changes in the political structure,
protect already existing gains, legalise specific decisions or trends
or improve subsequent negotiating conditions.
It is has become apparent that the tense street, which has been
utilized in the political strife and was injected with bigotry and
sectarian hatred, is now adding an extra burden on the dialogue.
Therefore it is now the duty of all parties sitting around the negotiating
table to curtail the presence of a street that refuses to accept
the necessary concessions needed to allow the process of political
reconciliation to succeed. This could be achieved through the immediate
cessation of the sectarian rhetoric of hatred, instigation and provocation
blowing from media outlets and mosques. We need to start a new rational
discourse that understand the concerns of the other, encourages
social co-existence and explains its benefits for both the state
and society.
We must stress to the other that the necessary concessions required
do not mean forfeiting their rights, but that they come within a
framework of a balanced process aiming at bringing about benefits
for everyone. Since the beginning of Bahrain’s events, all social
sectors and their political representatives realised that a new
political system was on the way. In fact many political analysts
and even some government figures have given some hints in that respect.
That in turn raised some fears among followers of different sectarian
segments, who began wondering whether the new system would benefit
them or serve their needs, and provide security and stability to
their families and children?
Both Sunni and Shia sectors have asked themselves the same questions.
It was also expressed explicitly in the political rhetoric of both
sides. This makes it important that the new discourse should stress
that consensual agreement does not mean that one political side
has won victory over the other, or that the balance is tipped in
favour of one political or sectarian side. It also does not mean
that basic citizens’ rights were allowed to slip away.
It is regrettable that some politicians are resorting to using
strong language whenever a political solution appears in the horizon,
in order to sabotage it and lobby against it and discredit those
behind it. By the same token the level of violence in the streets
escalates to delay the success of any political dialogue and to
keep the strife alive, may be for the purpose of exploiting the
situation for future negotiation’s gains.
It is the political and religious leadership’s responsibility,
if they are genuinely serious about the success of the national
dialogue and reaching a national reconciliation, to act and react
with restraint, and to refrain from the public inflammatory and
provocative statements that serve no purpose but further increase
the tension.
Many political leaders are finding themselves trapped by the
same streets they have initially mobilized. They started by inciting
the public, then ended up influenced and absorbed by the masses
to the extent that they could not control themselves in a way that
is conducive to the need of adhering to certain ethics and requirements
that should govern national political conduct and practices at this
critical juncture in the country’s history.
On the other hand confidence building necessitates that the government
should release the detainees especially women and children. Such
a step would facilitate dialogue, reduce tensions and put and end
to the cycle of actions and reactions.
It is our right to hope for a solution that would take Bahrain
out of the bottle neck, restore the social harmony and pave the
way towards a prosperous future.
|