Funding in the work of Human Rights Organizations 
				Almost all civil societies in Bahrain, including political parties 
				have condemned the recent unrest that took place in the country, 
				and insist on the importance of peaceful expression and the respect 
				of the rule of law. However, these societies, human rights ones 
				in particular, are facing a great challenge to remain neutral and 
				to adhere to human rights standards in the shadow of political and 
				security upheaval.  
				All occurrences in Bahrain are strongly connected to the political 
				situation; thus these organizations are not dealing with incidents 
				which are removed from political reality and, therefore, can not 
				pass judgment on each event independently. Instead, they face a 
				chain reaction of events and counter reactions which are difficult 
				to de-politicise and untangle, for in these events the cause has 
				become a result and the result has become a reason for the reoccurrence 
				of new events.  
				For this reason, human rights organizations, and despite their 
				attempts to distance themselves from the regime on the one hand, 
				and the opposition on the other, feel that their credibility is 
				being constantly challenged and that they are still being subjected 
				to criticism from both parties, and accused of favouring one over 
				the other. They are in the governments' eyes biased towards the 
				opposition's political agenda, easily believing its propaganda and 
				reports, and only seeing the negative aspects of events without 
				noting the positive ones. On the other hand political activists 
				view them as untrustworthy in their reports, siding with the government 
				and incompetent in presenting what is really happening on the ground.
				 
				To what extent are human rights organisations able to safeguard 
				their neutrality, and distance themselves from political agendas?
				 
				Initially, it can be said that all human rights organizations 
				are subjected to various kinds of challenges and pressures related 
				to their integrity and independence. It is difficult to achieve 
				absolute independence as there are no agreed upon standards for 
				neutrality. This is besides the fact that ‘neutrality’ in the performance 
				of human rights organisations varies from one subject or issue to 
				another.  
				Funding is an important consideration which could potentially 
				compromise an organisation’s neutrality, including those in Bahrain. 
				All large international human rights organizations–except Amnesty 
				International- depend on governmental and institutional financial 
				support. This support has a significant influence in determining 
				the country or the area targeted with follow ups and research, and 
				in many cases the supporting body determines the subject of the 
				follow ups, and the field of activity such as women’s rights, prisoners 
				of conscience, or freedom of expression etc. Occasionally, particularly 
				in the Middle East where conspiracy theory magnified, human rights 
				organizations are frequently depicted as partners in the political 
				project of a certain state or group of Western countries in particular.
				 
				In Bahrain the government was required to encourage civil society 
				organizations in general, since the beginning of the reforms in 
				2001. These organisations were first formed with government support 
				through the Ministry of Social Affairs, providing them with an official 
				bases, as well as the allocation of an annual budget. The question 
				is: does this funding affect the neutrality and the activity of 
				these organizations and to what extent? Or more importantly, does 
				financial support by government affect the neutrality of these organizations 
				in issues related to the government in particular?  
				This does not seem to be the case, at least for human rights 
				organisations, as the government still complains of their bias!
				 
				Other questions follow: is government funding sufficient to cover 
				all organisational activities? And are there any other financial 
				supporters? And do these affect the neutrality of the organizations 
				in question?  
				It is clear that government financial support is insufficient 
				to cover all their activities, but there are two possibilities in 
				this regard:  
				Foreign funding from states is strictly prohibited, and undoubtedly, 
				Bahraini organisations' loyalty is to their country and to their 
				fellow citizens. However, it is possible that there is some limited 
				and ineffective funding from foreign civil societies to their counterparts 
				in Bahrain. It should be noted that this kind of financial, media 
				and other support is legitimate in most of countries including Lebanon, 
				Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Palestine and Iraq among 
				others. As for local support from individuals and institutions inside 
				Bahrain-if it exists- this can easily be uncovered through the bank 
				statements of the organizations, and does not necessarily assume 
				that the supporters have specific political affiliations, and if 
				found, their impact is not absolute, and is probably limited.
				 
				In conclusion, there are no obvious effects of funding on the 
				neutrality of human rights organizations.  
				
				
				
				
				 |