Next Elections: Women Doomed to Failure Unless Supported
by Political Societies
A research study about women’s experience in the 2006 elections
and the probable outcome of the 2010 elections was conducted by
the Supreme Council for Women with the co-operation of UNDP. The
study recommends an increase in the financial support for societies,
committees and national councils concerned with women-related issues.
The Government’s financial support to political societies should
be linked to the amount of support given to female candidates. The
study also recommended (an increase in the proportion of female
representation in the Shura Council, taking into account the selection
of men and women who are faithful supporters of empowering women
in general, and political empowerment in particular, if possible,
and to take interim measures to support women and increase their
chances of success in the elections, according to CEDAW).
The study polled 500 voters about the nomination of women in
elections. The results of the survey showed that 74.1% supported
women nominating themselves, 24.1% objected to this idea. It also
revealed that 62% of pollsters would not vote for a woman and only
30.7% said that they would.
This sample reveals that the chances of women succeeding the
next election are very slim. This is the reason why some female
activists demand the adoption of the quota system. Others however,
believe that the number of women appointed in the Shura Council
should be increased. The Supreme Council for Women recommends that
the number of appointed women in the Shura Council should be increased.
It also recommends the application of pressure on political societies
to nominate women and change this patriarchal culture.
The study observed that women were not nominated by the main
political societies during the 2006 elections which lowered their
chances of winning. There are unofficial promises from the Al Wifaq
Society that two women will be on their candidates list, and if
this happens, it is most likely that they will win.
According to the same study, most female candidates in the previous
parliamentary elections were not associated with any political society.
There were 21 female nominees in the previous elections, 19 of which
ran independently (90.5%), while only two ran as part of political
societies (9.5%). With regards to the candidates’ level of education,
the study revealed that ‘all had received a suitable amount of education.
The percentage of female candidates with post graduates degrees
was 47.6%, and those with university degrees was 28.4% and only
23.8% were at GCSE level’
The study pointed to a number of obstacles facing female candidates,
including ‘their inability to build alliances, the lack of financial
support, the lack of an affordable specialized administrative team
and technical expertise’. Other obstacles include the tension in
the political atmosphere and the media and newspapers’ lack of cooperation
as they demanded a great amount of money for covering women’s elections
activities.
The study also shows that 28.8% of the candidates felt that the
reason for their failure in the elections was ‘due to the attitude
of religious leaders who have spiritual and social influence.’ These
leaders believe that the nomination of women for the legislative
council is not permissible. The study also showed that 19% of female
candidates attribute their failure to the influence of political
societies and other problems associated with elections. On the other
hand, 9.6% believe that mismanagement of the campaign was the problem,
and 4.8% thought that weak funding was behind their failure.
In order to help women in the next elections, the study recommends
that the Government put forward regulations that would organize
the campaign and would guarantee equal opportunities and limit the
financial obstacles facing women in the elections. The study also
recommends the introduction of a media policy based on principles
that are accepted by all media and information institutions. This
is in order to unify the coverage of the elections, limit the candidates’
financial influence in the media and reinforce its independence.
The media should also contribute in changing the perception of female
candidates in society.
|