Amnesty in Bahrain:
Openness and Concerns
In the context of its response to international recommendations
and human rights organizations, the Government of Bahrain has agreed
to working visits being carried out by these organizations. Amnesty
International has recently visited Bahrain (3-9 May 2014) and thereafter
issued a statement entitled: “Bahrain: Openness on Human Rights,
but Serious Concerns Remain”.
It had been Bahrain’s approach until two years ago to allow,
and even officially welcome, international organizations’ visits
to Bahrain and to permit them to carry out their activities without
intervention. But the Government has found that these organizations
do not reflect in their statements and reports the Government’s
strenuous attempts to reform the human rights situation. Thus, the
Government responded with intransigence to the subsequent visit
requests by such organizations. This has been considered as deterioration
in the level of transparency, which made the Government appear as
if it was attempting to hide abuses away from the eyes of the world.
However, this approach has changed since the beginning of 2014.
Bahrain and its officials have adopted an open door policy vis-a-vis
such organizations. The Bahraini Foreign Minister has met with Amnesty
International’s Secretary General as well as the officials of the
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and other organizations.
Accordingly, Amnesty International recently visited Bahrain, an
approach which is supposed to, and should, continue to include all
other international human rights organizations.
The content of the aforementioned Amnesty statement is amply
summarised by its title. Amnesty International has sensed an official
desire to work on tackling the human rights dossier. The statement
has confirmed the candour and openness of government officials during
Amnesty’s talks with them. It further confirmed that those officials
have taken legal and institutional steps to address the violations.
According to the statement, the Bahraini authorities have emphasized
their commitment and willingness to rectify the situation, and pleaded
for more time as well as an effective contribution by the international
community to help prevent the occurrence of violations. Such contribution
could include the training of security personnel and the provision
of expertise; the creation of the necessary mechanisms to realise
the goal of supporting and protecting human rights and the activation
of the national institutions created by the government for this
purpose.
But the statement also reflected Amnesty’s concerns. These include
the lack of real reform of the judiciary and continuing restrictions
on the freedom of expression, association and assembly. Among the
concerns are the continuing detentions even among women and the
issuance of harsh sentences in connection with rioting which included
children, according to Amnesty’s statement.
What concerns us here is to emphasize the need for the government
to take legal and institutional steps to address violations. It
is necessary to activate the human rights organizations that have
been established with the aim of achieving justice for victims,
supporting the rule of law and protecting human rights. The activities
of these organisations need to achieve tangible progress that can
be felt by both the victims and the observers of human rights conditions
in Bahrain. Otherwise, those institutions can neither earn the trust
nor the cooperation of all segments of the society. Moreover, without
real results on the ground, those official institutions cannot earn
credibility in the eyes of the international human rights community.
In general, the Amnesty International statement can be assessed
as follows:
The statement was balanced and positive, especially in expressing
the seriousness of the Government of Bahrain regarding addressing
its human rights dossier, and the steps taken in this regard. It
was expected that the statement would refer to the concerns which
the entire international community awaits to see some serious official
steps towards addressing. The Bahraini human rights dossier will
keep lingering on unless the causes of concern are addressed including
the existence of prisoners of conscience, in the eyes of the international
human rights community, in addition to matters pertaining to the
space available for the freedoms of expression, association and
assembly;
During the period following the visit of Amnesty delegation to
Bahrain, preparations were under way for the meetings of the 26th
session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva. International organisations
have assembled to sign a joint statement that was issued later,
on the situation of human rights in Bahrain. Amnesty’s signature
was notably absent from the statement. This was interpreted by some
as indicating that Amnesty did not find that hard-line statement
expressive of the reality of the situation in Bahrain. It has also
been said that to avoid pressure, Amnesty opted to issue a statement
about its visit to Bahrain instead of signing a hard-line statement.
Amnesty delegation’s visit to Bahrain and the fact that the authorities
there have allowed the delegation to freely conduct interviews with
official bodies and civil society; has led the organisation to come
out with a good impression on the genuine tendencies and seriousness
of the Bahraini government, which was largely reflected in Amnesty’s
statement. Through its delegation, Amnesty enjoyed a first hand
experience with the situation in Bahrain, via transparent dialogues
with all parties and access to information from all official and
other bodies. Officials also listened directly to the concerns and
recommendations of the delegation’s members. All this, has been
sufficient enough to alter the semi-stereotypic perception of the
domestic human rights situation in Bahrain held by the organisation,
and to persuade the latter not to adopt some of the more harsh criticism
and calls for the tightening of international pressure on the government
of Bahrain, as was the case with other organisations.
Hence, Bahraini officials need to understand the nature of work
of international human rights organizations; and not to rush into
preventing them from coming to Bahrain. Officials should handle
data and reports with a professional, open-minded mentality aimed
at reforming the human rights situation, rather than wrangling with
one side or the other. They should also understand the political
and international human rights climate and pressures that breed
different positions and reactions ranging from extreme harshness
to moderation. However, it should be noted that moderation does
not mean silence or refraining from criticism or from issuing statements
or to simply wait for praise of official achievements.
At the official level, Bahrain is also required to take a bold
initiative aimed at achieving a breakthrough in the issues of concern
raised by the international community. Officially, Bahrain is also
required to reaffirm its willingness to continue cooperation with
all international human rights entities, for a better future for
Bahrain and its people.
|