Bahrain in the Strategic Report (2009)
The Bahrain Centre of Research and Studies has released its second
strategic report, which contains frank discussions of internal problems
facing Bahrain at the local and international levels. In its report,
the Centre presented its comments on the general situation as follows:
■ With regards to foreign workers and the abolishment of the
‘sponsor system’, the report states that the abolished law represents
an insult to human rights and that abolishing it is a progressive
and humanitarian step in line with human rights principles. However,
the abolishment of the system has led to many problems such as an
increase in unemployment, which in turn has increased crime rates
and the level of unemployment among Bahrainis.
■ The report discusses freedom of press, and most importantly
the call for issuing a new law, which allows more freedom and prevents
the imprisonment of journalists. The report emphasized that the
issuing of such a law is a solution to most problems in this regard.
■ Concerning human rights, the report pointed to the cases that
had been raised during the last two years in relation to women,
children, human trafficking and torture, among others. The report
explained that there are some reports, which concluded that the
state of human rights is deteriorating, and highlighted the Bahrain’s
fulfillment of its commitments to the Human Rights Council. Regarding
torture, the report recalled the pre-reform situation and the clashes
and violations that took place, asserting that political societies
are demanding the punishment of perpetrators of torture during that
period. Also, the report pointed to the establishment of some human
rights institutions, some of which visited Bahraini prisons and
some others called to implement transitional justice. The report
stated that arrests were made during clashes in demonstrations and
concluded that human rights issues and political ones have been
confused. This phenomenon is common among many human rights organizations
in the third world because they are newly established institutions
with little experience, in addition to the fact that the state itself
is emerging.
■ The report observes that Bahrain is experiencing a dynamic
condition and a positive movement, and pointed to the wide margin
of freedom of assembly and protest which has become a prominent
feature of political life in Bahraini society. By analyzing cultural,
political and economic activities in the country, which included
seminars, lectures, protests, strikes and workshops among others,
the report considers this a reflection of a dynamic society despite
its shortcomings.
■ The report also points to the fact that political societies,
despite occasionally engaging in sectarianism, have shown improvement
and maturity in their activities in the last two years. It notes
the existence of sectarian alignments between political societies
in the House of Representatives with or against ministers belonging
to other sects.
■ The report allocates a large space for the issue of sectarianism,
including the hitherto unexplored role of the House of Representatives.
It states that sectarianism in Bahrain is increasing and has foreign
roots and that the gap between the two main social components, Shia
and Sunni, is widening. The report also notes that a great deal
of issues are being politicized and interpreted in a sectarian manner
such as the issues of housing, naturalization and employment, among
others.
■ The report notes that protests, which demand improvements in
basic living needs, were organized according to sectarian lines,
Sunni and Shia, including private majalis or gatherings. It also
points to a limited sectarian dispute which took place in Muharraq
due to a Shia religious occasion. It adds that sectarianism is also
a factor in employment prospects in some governmental, quasi-governmental
and even private agencies although this was not official, and was
not done in a systematic manner. The report stresses that this unofficial
favoritism, which dominates the social and political situation,
has resulted in weakening society’s progress, including the political
field.
■ The report also notes that some civil society institutions
have been affected by sectarian favoritism, which has led to the
loss of human resources. This is due to the dominance of the sectarian
mind-set in political and social activities to the extent that political
societies and civil society organizations have been classified according
to sectarian affiliation. This means that these institutions serve
certain groups as is the case with some charitable trusts.
■ Parliament has also been affected by the constant disagreements
between Shia and Sunni members, most of whom belong to religious
political societies. According to the report, Parliament has not
progressed much in terms of proposals and in its supposed monitoring
role. The report explains that requests for the questioning of some
ministers in the House of Representatives, the ensuing discussions
as well as the final results, were all dominated by a sectarian
spirit, and exchanged accusations between MPs of different sects.
The report states that if this polarization should continue it will
hinder the development process and will have a negative effect on
the reform project, as well as slowing down improvements to the
standard of living of citizens. However, the report also points
to some positive aspects during the last two years, including the
fact that the House of Representatives has become more realistic
in practicing its legislative role and that MPs have become more
experienced in parliamentary activities, in addition to an increase
in requests for Ministers’ questioning compared to the first parliamentary
stage in which some MPs attempted to prove their role, independence
and ability to challenge the Executive Authority.
|