Amnesty’s Report on Issues of Concern
The Government: The Report Presented
a Distorted Image & We Welcome Cooperation
Amnesty International issued a lengthy report on the state of
human rights in Bahrain after two field visits in which it met with
state officials, civil society institutions as well as the National
institution for human rights among others.
The report entitled “Behind the rhetoric: Human rights abuses
in Bahrain continue unabated” outlined human rights developments
in Bahrain since the 2011 events and its aftermath. The report relied
heavily on the recommendations of the report of the Bahrain Independent
Commission of Inquiry which became better known as the “Bassiouni
report” that was adopted as the benchmark in assessing the situation
in Bahrain in the various aspects that were tackled.
Amnesty International’s report went over its concerns which included
the existence of violations and cases of torture and ill-treatment,
as well as the trials of activists that do not meet international
standards for fair trial. The report devoted ample space to the
issue of the freedom of expression in Bahrain and the absence of
a clear and modern law on the establishment of associations. The
report documented cases of what it called the evasion of accountability
and pointed to the anti-government elements carryi?g out bombings
and acts of violence and throwing bombs that targeted security forces.
The report also discussed the institutional and legislative reforms
undertaken by the government of Bahrain including the establishment
of the Ombudsman Office at the Ministry of Interior, the Special
Investigation Unit at the Public Prosecution and the revamping of
the National institution for Human Rights among others and evaluated
their performance since their inception, and the shortcomings in
each and every one of them and offered pertinent recommendations.
But the report also noted what it described as a continuation
of the climate of repression and the decline in public freedoms
especially the freedom of assembly and peaceful protesting and pointed
to the harassment and prosecution of activists and restrictions
it saw on non-governmental organizations in addition to what the
report claimed was targeting political associations. It also assessed
the anti-terrorism law enacted by the government recently.
The report discussed in length the revocation of citizenship
by either the Ministry of the Interior or the courts as well as
the issues of arbitrary detention and prison conditions and made
recommendations in all these issues that are deemed of concern in
order for them to be addressed and rectified.
The report concluded that there is a failure in achieving basic
human rights reforms and that there is a continuing crisis which
in order to be addressed requires: harmonizing domestic laws with
international standards; releasing all those detained for exercising
their lawful right to freedom of expression, association and peaceful
assembly; beginning comprehensive judiciary reforms in order to
ensure full impartiality and independence from the executive branch.
Among the recommendations made in the reportby Amnesty International
were thorough investigations into allegations of torture and deaths
in custody, compensating the victims and their relatives appropriately,
ordering retrials for each of those convicted in the trials that
did not meet the conditions of a fair trial, ensuring the application
of the principle of accountability and no impunity, lifting the
ban on peaceful protests, removing restrictions on freedom of expression
and association, adopting a l?w for non-governmental organizations
that respects and protects their freedom of establishing and to
ensure that all human rights defenders, human rights organizations
are able to do their work freely.
The report called for directing the police to adhere to international
standards on the rules of engagement during protests and to ensure
that law enforcement officials receive regular training to perform
their duties which must include respecting and applying of human
rights principles.
Finally, the report called for allowing the Special Rapporteur
on torture, the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges
and lawyers to visit Bahrain and to cooperate with international
human rights organizations and pave the way for them to visit Bahrain.
The Official Response to the Report
The Bahraini government issued in a statement on April 16, 2015
saying that it has received Amnesty International’s report and is
reviewing its content and recommendations “including a series of
anonymous allegations it contains” It affirmed its unflinching commitment
to the protection of human rights and basic freedoms, and said it
continued to consistently demonstrate this in recent years.
The statement added that “despite receiving Bahrain’s full cooperation
during Amnesty International’s visit and preparation of its report,
in its hurry to publish the report for media attention, Amnesty
did not reflect the facts that were provided in all clarity and
transparency including important clarifications provided by the
Government on substantial points of fact”.
“This has resulted in significant shortcomings in the report,
which could have easily been avoided, if greater rigor and less
haste had been applied,” the government position stated.
The government statement observed that Amnesty International
“fleetingly” acknowledged the fundamental institutional and legal
reforms that Bahrain has undertaken in the past four years and described
as “a significant step forward” but it “glossed over these highly
significant strides and the work of international experts and governmental
partners which culminated in the establishment of several independent
oversight mechanisms including the Ombudsman Office at the Ministry
of Interior, Prisoners and Detainees Rights Commission, Special
Investigation Unit at the Public Prosecution, and a National institution
for Human Rights to further strengthen legal guarantees for the
protection of human rights, and to ensure accountability and justice”.
The official response stated that these institutions, while newly
established, gained international recognition including from the
European Union (EU) which awarded the National Institution for Human
Rights and the Ombudsman’s Office (the Chaillot award) for the Gulf
region in 2014 stressing that these countries “set high human rights
standards”.
The Bahraini government statement criticized Amnesty International
because it “fundamentally misreported Bahrain’s respect of the rights
to freedom of opinion and expression and to peaceful assembly. These
rights are protected by Bahrain’s constitution, and the government
continues to uphold them robustly”. But the Bahraini government
“as any other responsible government will not tolerate violent attacks
or incitement to violence committed under the guise of free speech
and peaceful protest” stressing that?it is the government’s duty
“to protect citizens, residents, and visitors alike and the government
makes no apology for doing so. Bahrain will respond to such attacks
in accordance with its law and best international practices”.
The official response concluded with saying that “Bahrain has
a strong track record of openness to dialogue and cooperation with
human rights organizations, allied countries and the United Nations.
It will continue this cooperation and to welcome accurate and factual
reporting on developments and accomplishments in the country”.
|